THINKER, SPEAKER, ACTIVIST, CHAIRMAN

The Noosphere and the nature of evolution

For millennia we have thought that we think our own thoughts. But what if there is a realm of thought that we can access through our minds acting as transmitters, and what if this realm were reaching a point where its very nature was about to be transformed.

“Despite current ads and slogans the world does not change one person at a time. It changes as networks of relationships form amongst people who discover they share a common cause and vision of what’s possible” Meg Weatley and Deborah Frieze

But that very cause and vision emerges as an attribute of the noosphere. Like a hive, where individual bees do not have within them the innate “wisdom of the hive,” so with humanity where individual minds do not hold the innate “wisdom of the time” which is held collectively by the noosphere and we are able to access it through an “open mind” That access is limited only by the individual mind’s ability to see clearly into the noosphere and not be limited through strongly held presuppositions.

It seems to me that evolution is a journey. A spiritual voyage leading to an understanding of the nature of the reality in which we live. This reality in the past has been determined by the consciousness available to our species through the noosphere. It appears that originally it was difficult for humanity to experience a state of separate identity either from nature or the tribe or group from which we emanated. “I am an Israelite or a Canaanite.” seems to be the level of self identification. Separation from the tribe by ceremony would lead to certain death as the basic recognition of myself was removed. Over time identification became linked with lineage as well as tribe so that “I am Lawrence, son of Sidney, an Israelite from the tribe of Simeon” became possible.

Through the ages this evolution of consciousness fed the noosphere, so that our perception of the world and ourselves changed slowly over time. From the networks around Copernicus to those communities around Galileo and Kepler it took over 100 years (from the late 15th. Century to the end of the 16th. Century) for a heliocentric view of the world to begin to become a reality in the minds of mankind. When Darwin in 1859 published “The origin of the Species” where he hypothecated that man and nature did not arise perfectly formed in the days allotted in the Book of Genesis, but were rather the result of environmental competition leading to natural selection it caused a profound uproar. and it was not until the emergence of the modern evolutionary synthesis from the 1930s to the 1950s that a broad consensus developed that natural selection was the basic mechanism of evolution. So over time communities of interest feed information into the common collective thought or noosphere until a newly  evolved world view arises.

In my view these two recent examples of an emerging world view taking just over 100 years to complete its transition is almost lightening fast when compared to the glacial shifts of thought that preceded them. Indeed the scientific and industrial age created a self image and worldview that in my opinion makes this Conference in Astana of extreme world importance.

The shift of perception over the last half of the past millennium had the effect of removing mankind from its view of itself as being divinely created and part of the whole of creation whilst simultaneously being at the centre of it. In the last 500 years we emerge as a species which is the result of chance and natural selection and rather than being at the centre of the Universe with everything revolving around us, we discover ourselves on the third rock orbiting an undistinguished sun in the outer regions of space.

This worldview encouraged a disconnection from each other, the planet that gives us life, the Cosmos that gave us birth and ultimately ourselves. And so we devised financial systems based on the greed of constant growth, expansion and the accumulation of supposed wealth. We came to believe that we could achieve prosperity without social justice, without environmental sustainability and without spiritual fulfillment, which is nothing less than a sense of awe and connectedness with all things.

But since the advent of quantum physics our whole view of reality is being challenged by the behavior of matter at sub atomic levels and the evidence of neuroscience that this is a much more personal and subjective world than the objective reality we thought we were watching.

So why does an International Conference on the Noosphere, at the present time, become so critically important to the future of our society and maybe even our species.

The Noosphere as I have expressed above is essentially that reservoir of thought that reflects what the “hive” has learned and accepted. But we now need to understand it really well as we might soon be passing from the age of the evolution of consciousness into the age of conscious evolution.

The Noosphere , according to the thoughts of Vladimir Vernadsky and Teilhard de Chardin, denotes the “sphere of human thought”. The word is derived from the Greek νοῦς (nousmind“) + σφαῖρα (sphaira “sphere“).  So what happens at the noospheric level when we become fully conscious to its presence?

Humanity is in crisis. It has already exceeded its livable footprint on this planet and is so poisoning its geosphere and biosphere that the noosphere itself is in jeopardy through our potentially suicidal behaviour.

Understanding that evolution is a stepped rather than a gradual process is important to this dialogue. The steps are invariably crises which “force” the species to reach a higher level of complexity or dissolve back into the “all of life”.

We are at that point now. Our understanding, through understanding the noosphere, of how we evolve ourselves  through our thinking, will determine our success of adapting, in Darwinian terms, to our next stage. Many of us believe that we are the result of 15 billion years of evolution and we will discover in the next 15 years whether we are a viable species. Much of our crisis will be around our collective thinking.

By focusing on the noosphere the Astana Conference is taking the single most important factor driving our next evolutionary shift as a species. Everything we share and discover needs to be collated and shared amongst us as a “Community of Interest”  in this way we may both witness and shepherd to our transition from unconscious compulsive thinking to conscious chosen thinking.

The prizes for success are beyond our most visionary dreams, and the penalties for failure, beyond our worst nightmares.

Lawrence Bloom

London, UK

13th August 2010


Chair of the Global Agenda Council on Urban Management – 2008

In June 2008, Lawrence accepted an invitation from The World Economic Forum to Chair their Global Agenda Council on Urban Management.


Noosphere Constitution – Kazakhstan – October 2010

In October 2010 Lawrence was invited by Nursultan Abishuly Nazarbayev the President of Kazakhstan to attend and speak at the Forum for Spiritual Culture to celebrate and offer the “Noosphere Constitution” to the Kazakh people. Lawrence’s consultative paper was entitled: “How the incorporation of our understanding of the Noosphere into a Constitutional Framework is both a necessary and a visible example of our evolutionary trajectory”


China EXPO 2010

This is Lawrence Bloom giving the keynote overseas address at the last Prepcom before the Shanghai World Expo, “Better Cities, Better Life”


Bogota 2038 Forum

In September 2010 Lawrence was invited to be a keynote speaker at the Columbia 2038 Conference in Bogota. Whilst in Columbia he spoke to over 500 students at the Universidad del Rosario http://www.urosario.edu.co/La-Universidad/Informacion-General/Historia/Origen-y-Fundacion/ as well as at the main event. Other speakers at the event included Senior Officials from the World Bank and Inter American Development Bank Also displayed is an email from the organisers after the event.

Dear Mr. Bloom,
It is with great gratitude that we write you this message to thank you for taking part in Bogota 2038 Forum. It was an honor to have you as a speaker and have the opportunity to listen to your ideas. Your speech was really inspirational and it will contribute to the future of our city. We have received many comments about your speech and all of them agreed that yours was one of the best sessions of Bogota 2038.

Thanks to the commitment and support of high profile international speakers like you, it is possible for Revista Semana to keep on working on Bogota’s sustainable development consciousness.

Once again we would like to say that we are deeply grateful for your encouraging participation at Bogota 2038.

We hope you have enjoyed your stay in Bogota and had a great trip back home.

All the best,

Juliana Ruiz
Proyectos Especiales
Publicaciones SEMANA
Bogotá, Colombia

Click here for original article in El Colombiano.

El cambio climático y los efectos que está provocando en todo el mundo, es quizás el problema más grave que enfrentan las naciones como sociedad.

A esta conclusión llegó el experto en cambio climático el británico Lawrence Bloom, que visitó Colombia para hablar sobre cómo luchar contra este fenómeno partiendo de una economía ecológica, sostenible, y de los beneficios de la misma tanto para los gobierno como para las industrias.

Y es que según Bloom, eventos como las inundaciones que se presentaron en Pakistán durante agosto, donde al menos 1.000 personas murieron y 20 mil quedaron sin hogar, es prueba de que los efectos del cambio climático son una realidad actual.

Más allá de los acuerdos a los cuales lleguen los países industrializados, los que cargan el yugo de ser los mayores responsables del deterioro de la capa de ozono, para Bloom, lo que pueden hacer las naciones denominadas en vía de desarrollo es enorme.

El reto es crear ciudades sostenibles con los recursos que se tienen a la mano. Según el experto británico los latinoamericanos no son muy inteligentes en el uso de los desperdicios, especialmente en la industria de alimentos, donde se desecha gran cantidad de producto cuando no es consumible.

Un error para Bloom porque el alimento al descomponerse libera metano a la atmosfera, un gas de efecto invernadero, 20 veces más potente que el CO2. Lo curioso es que el metano a su vez, sirve para producir energía, algo que desconocen muchos industriales, o que quizás no han puesto en práctica por falta de orientación y concientización.

Para el experto las fuentes están dadas, pero lo que hace falta es conectar la cadena entre quienes tienen los desechos y no saben qué hacer con ellos, y los que buscan otras alternativas para producir energía a más bajos costos y de una forma que sea sostenible en el tiempo.

Una alternativa que favorecería no solo a la industria sino a los gobiernos, porque las fuentes de empleo se diversificarían, porque cada región podría producir su propia energía. De paso, las áreas de estudio tendrían otros horizontes para donde mirar, de una forma que sea amigable con el medio ambiente.

Otra de las estrategias que las ciudades pueden implementar son los techos verdes, una iniciativa que es apropiada para Bloom y que viene tomando fuerza en Colombia, para reducir el calor en las edificaciones sin acudir a métodos que consumen mucha electricidad.

El problema para el experto radica en que “cada persona vive en su pequeño mundo y no hay nadie que esté haciendo el trabajo de conectarnos”.

Menos aún los gobiernos que no saben hacia donde mirar, ni como trabajar mancomunadamente con otras naciones para resolver un problema que es de todos.

Por eso, Bloom viene trabajando con la organización Alianza de Prosperidad Climática, para orientar a los gobiernos, industria y sociedad en cada ciudad que visita sobre la importancia de cambiar el “ship” de las formas de producción y consumo actual y de cómo hacer el paso hacia una economía ambiental sostenible.

Aunque parece ser que los efectos del cambio climático son irreparables, y que no solo se sentirán en los países más contaminados, para Bloom entre más esperemos más cerca estaremos de vivir una gran crisis ambiental, que en Colombia, tan solo en este año venimos sintiendo primero con el fenómeno de ‘El Niño’ y ahora con el de ‘La Niña”.

Sin embargo, para el experto es de destacar que todas las naciones están haciendo un esfuerzo por resolver un problema, ignorado durante muchos años. En algunos países se ha puesto el empeño en habilitar capitales de riesgo, para invertir en tecnología ecológica, una estrategia que solo es parte de la solución, la cual debe ir acompañada de un diálogo centrado primordialmente en la importancia de preservar el medio ambiente.

Sobre Lawrence Bloom
Lawrence Bloom es vicepresidente de la Alianza de Prosperidad Climática (Climate Prosperity Alliance) y es miembro de la junta de Directores de Desarrollo Urbano Global (Global Urban Development – GUD).

Trabajó en el Comité Ejecutivo del Grupo Hotelero Intercontinental, administrando su portafolio inmobiliario de 3 billones de dólares y creó el manual ambiental para la cadena de Hoteles Intercontinental, que fue aprobado por el Príncipe Carlos de Inglaterra y que en la actualidad es usado por 4.5 millones de hoteles en todo el mundo.

Es presidente de la Iniciativa de Economía Verde para ciudades verdes, edificios y transporte del Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Medio ambiente – Pnuma (United Nations Enviromental Program – Unep).


Davos 2010 – World Economic Forum

Reuters Blog Article: http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/28/building-a-three-legged-stool/


« Previous Entries

© Copyright 2011 Lawrence Bloom | Site by Nuviu